Saturday, July 19. 2008msttcorefonts renamed and losing relevanceTrackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Except that ttf-liberation is not a complete replacement of msttcorefonts (which contains more than just 3 fonts), so putting Provides: msttcorefonts in ttf-liberation is a bit of a lie.
Not only that. ttf-liberation provides different font with the same metrics. That means that it is not a drop-in replacement. You can't accurately reproduce documents that use Microsoft's font using the liberation fonts. Especially in print this is important. (Although using Microsoft fonts in print is a bad idea generally.)
Oh, and your Captcha sucks bad. I've now entered the wrong letters three times in a row. And I'm not visually impaired.
All well and fine except Tahoma is still sine qua non if you're thinking of using a font which does Arabic (and a few other oddball languages too, I'd imagine) in a legible fashion.
Sure, that's why I think it's an improvement for many users, not a general solution and reason to remove msttcorefonts entirely.
The fonts aren't nearly as good unantialiased compared to the MS fonts. Although they're vastly superior to DejaVu.
I don't have much knowledge about fonts, so forgive me if this question is completely lame...
Are these fonts identical in sizes to what people get by default under Windows? It's kinda frustrating for a web developer to see that sometimes one line of text on one machine turns out to be two lines on the other (given exactly the same space, pixel-wise). Heck, there's a pretty big difference between Opera and FF3 on my machine... .
|
QuicksearchBlogroll |